No Presumption of Vesting in Retiree Health Benefits

The Supreme Court held that ordinary contract principles apply in determining whether retiree health benefits are vested.

Document Excerpt’

In this case, the Court of Appeals applied the Yard-Man inferences to conclude that, in the absence of extrinsic evidence to the contrary, the provisions of the contractindicated an intent to vest retirees with lifetime benefits. Tackett II, 733 F. 3d, at 599–600. As we now explain, those inferences conflict with ordinary principles of contract law.


About Us

Benefits Forward is a news site for professionals in the field of employee benefits. Our goal is to provide the latest information about the benefits field and to host a community discussion regarding related issues.

Seminars, Conferences & Other Events

  • Sorry, there are no articles in this category.

Need Help Correcting Plan Errors?

Contact us for either consultation on how you can Self Correct or to propose cost effective correction methods using VCP. Or contact us to submit under VCP on your behalf or on behalf of your client. Contact us by email.